|
|
![]() The Nature of the Earth’s Rock Record From the surface of the earth to the center of its core is a distance of about 6000 km. The surface of the earth is covered in a very thin crust. The continental crust has a range of thickness from 35 to 60km. The oceanic crust rarely exceeds 5 km in thickness (Levin 1986, 9). The geologic history of the earth is preserved in these relatively thin layers of rocks (Press 28). The analysis of the rock record begins with data collection, “… which consists mostly of describing, measuring, and interpreting… rock sequences in the field” (Prothero 25). An understanding of this rock record is dependent upon understanding the nature of the earth’s rocks and what rules are used to decode them. Types of Rock in the Rock Record In a historical analysis of the rock record one may often begin with the origin of rocks present in the geologic record. “The initial subdivision of rocks is made on the basis of origin, and the three major categories are igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary” (Press 75). An examination of the rocks reveals the geologic history that formed those rocks. A geologist will receive detailed training about each of these types of rocks. Igneous rocks are formed as molten rock cools. When igneous rocks form below the surface of the earth they are called intrusive igneous rocks. When igneous rocks from on the surface of the earth they are called extrusive igneous rocks. Extrusive igneous rocks will generally have very small crystals or no crystals at all. This is because they cool very quickly. Intrusive igneous rocks cool more slowly, and will typically have larger crystals. The mineral composition of igneous rocks is a function of pressure (under which it was formed), temperature, and composition of the last stable equilibrium of the system forming the rock. The bulk chemical composition of igneous and metamorphic rocks may be used to determine the source of the material that formed the rocks (Best 18). Sedimentary processes produce sedimentary rocks. Sedimentary processes include the breaking down of previously existing rocks into sediments, the transportation of sediments by water, wind, or glacial movement, the depositing of sediments in a new location, and the solidification of sediments into rocks. The properties of the sedimentary rocks may be used to determine which sedimentary processes produced any given sedimentary rock or sequence of sedimentary rocks. Geologists look at the overall geometry of the sedimentary rock bodies and their physical and biological structures. The porosity and permeability, acoustical features, resistance to erosion and radioactivity of sedimentary rocks also help explain how they originated. Sedimentary geologist will typically look at a number of sequences of rocks with similar features. They will then determine which features are similar to those occurring in the local sedimentary record. Based on this information a model of the possible environment that produced the local sedimentary sequence. Geologist will use these models to help them develop models for new locations and will continue to test the model by comparing it to new data discovered at other locations (Prothero 42). The nature of metamorphic processes that form them and the composition of the parent material from which they are derived determine the characteristics of metamorphic rocks. Metamorphic rocks are classified based upon texture and composition. Looking at the texture and composition of metamorphic rocks allows geologist to determine both their history and the type of metamorphism they have undergone (Levin 1986, 161). Understanding what rocks can tell us Beginning about the end of the Eighteen-century geologist recognized that geologic forces reshape the earth. In 1785 James Hutton proposed that geologic process occurred in cycles. These processes, according to Hutton, occur in a uniform fashion throughout time. A study of present geologic process allows us to determine how geologic processes worked in the past. The physical and chemical laws that govern geologic activities remain uniform throughout time (Press 38). As geologists use the present to decode the past, they must be careful not to assume that geologic changes in the past occurred in the same manner and on the same scale as today. Geologist should also remember the possibility that some the earth’s past geologic processes may not still exist or be active. We can use the theoretical framework of similar processes working throughout the geologic past, but must not assume that these processes occur with the same energy or at the same rate. The geologic record forms at best an imperfect chronicle of the earth’s history (Geikie 638). Hutton believed in explaining the past history of the world by what is observed in nature today. William Whenwell coined the term uniformitarianism. Charles Lyell later popularized this term. Geikie coined the catchy phrase, “the present is the key to the past” (Levin 1988, 12). The limited application of uniformitarianism may be see by reading Geikie’s article in the Eleventh Edition of the The Encyclopedia Britannica (see the references for this article). Within its historical context, uniformitarianism was introduced as a philosophical outgrowth of the work of men such as Isaac Newton. Newton and others that shared his mechanical view of the world saw the universe as governed by natural laws, rather than a sovereign God. Many of these scientists were Deist and preferred to think of God dealing with his creation through natural laws rather than supernatural intervention. The movement toward naturalism was a resurrection of Greek and Roman ideas. Hutton’s uniformitarianism contradicted the traditional view of catastrophism. Traditional catastrophism viewed the earth as the product of supernatural creation and Noachian deluge. For the supporters of traditional catastrophism most of the earth’s geologic record resulted from a universal flood. Hutton’s uniformitarianism contradicted the prevailing interpretation of scripture at the time (Prothero 9). A typical statement of the view of catastrophism of the time may be found in the 1691 edition of Thomas Burnet’s The Sacred Theory of the Earth. “The universality of the Deluge is also attested by profane [i.e. secular] History…. And we cannot without offering violence to all Records of Authority, Divine and Humane, deny that there hath been an universal Deluge upon the Earth; and that if their was an universal Deluge, no question it was that of Noah’s, and that which Moses described…” (38 – 39). Rules for Interpreting the Geologic Record In 1669 Nicolus Steno, while observing tilted rocks in Tuscany, derived three laws of sedimentary rocks, based on his conclusion that sedimentary rocks were at one time soft sediments. “The principle of superposition states that in any sequence of undisturbed strata, the oldest layer is at the bottom, and successively higher layers are younger” (Levin 1988, 9). For the most part, the principle of superposition governs the depositing of sedimentary rocks. In a zone where two plates of oceanic crust meet, one (the older one) will be subducted (pulled down) below the other plate. During subduction, pelagic sediments are scraped off the subducted plate onto the overriding plate. An accretionary wedge forms along the arc as these sediments begin to accumulate. In this process new material is constantly added to the bottom of the pile, a reversal of the principle of superposition. The rocks produced by underplating are typically a mass of chaotically mixed, brecciated blocks in highly sheared matrix known as a melange (Prothero, 332). Most strata of sedimentary rocks are tilted or folded. Steno concluded that since most sediments settle from a fluid under the influence of gravity. For this reason, sediments must have been deposited nearly horizontal and parallel to the surface on which they were accumulating. This became known as the principle of original horizontality. When a geologist observes sediments that are tilted, this indicates a time of crustal disturbance after deposition (Levin 1988, 10). Steno’s third principle states that sedimentary layers from in continuous sheets that either covered the entire earth or were bounded by solid substances. Erosion can act as an agent to separate rocks with a valley from their original continuous state. This is known as the principle of original continuity (Prothero 6). The Use of Fossils in Stratigraphy The Englishmen William Smith became one of the first people to carefully observe and record in which rock bed fossils occurred. Smith soon noticed that similar fossils in rock units could be used to identify the rock units. At first Smith used this to correlate rocks over short distances. The correlation of these rocks units allowed him to match rocks of the same relative age, but of differing lithologies. Soon Smith used this principle to correlate rocks over great distances. Eventually the principle developed into the idea of biological succession. Biological succession holds that the life of each age of the earth’s history was unique for a given period time. Fossils were used to correlate rock units based on similar fossil content and assumed to be of the same age (Levin 1988, 15). Today, biologists recognize that organisms exist in specific etiological settings. Entire continents or large portions of a continent separated by major geographical barriers make up biogeogrpahical realms. Each biogeogrpahical realm is distinguished with a specific assembly of plants and animals. Each biogeogrpahical realm is made up of distinct communities called biomes (Davis 778). Many of the changes observed in fossil assemblages are due to changes in the physical environment. Biological successions brought about by changes in the environment occur in tens to hundreds of years (Stearn 395). When environments suddenly change, a species that was once successful in that environment could become extinct. At this time, surviving organisms can freely move into the recently vacated niches (Davis 700). What the fossil record shows is periods with no new species appearing, and then suddenly new species appear, first as peripheral members of other niches, and then as dominating niches vacated through extinction. “Because transition takes place rapidly, intermediate forms are unlikely to be preserved anywhere in the fossil record” (Stearn 349). The Frenchmen, Cuvier and Brongniart validated Smith’s findings of fossil succession. They also found that this sucession was almost the same wherever they found it. Cuvier and Brongniart believed that the fossil record resulted from a series of catastrophes that caused complot extinction. And that after each catastrophe new species arose. They considered that lst of these catastrophic episodes to be the Noachian Deluge. The main flaw with the theories of Cuvier and Brongniart was that they did not explain how new species arose on earth (Levin 1988, 15 & 16). In 1830 Charles Lyell expanded upon the work of Steno by publishing his Principles of Geology. Lyell explained that geologic features that cut across another body of rock must be younger than the rocks, which they cut across. This is the principle known as crosscutting relationship, and applies not only to rocks but also to geologic features such as faults and unconformaties. Furthermore, Lyell concluded that rock fragments contained in larger rock masses are older than the rock masses in which they are enclosed. “Thus whenever two rock masses are in contact, the one containing pieces of the other will be the younger of the two (Levin 1988, 16 – 17). With the work of Lyell in place geologists had most of the basic tools in hand to study and begin to understand the earth’s geologic history as preserved in the pages of the rock layers of the crust. Over the next several decades geologist from all over the world studied rock layers and correlated them. Fossils were the key element used to accomplish this correlation. The earth’s geologic record can be divided into series of strata, characterized by distinctive organic remains. Steno’s laws are used to correlate rocks on a regional and global scale. The geologic record is nowhere complete, but generally follows the same sequence (Geikie 668). “In most areas, the stratigraphic record must be patched together from many short local section (Prothero 185). The geologic column only gives us the relative ages of rocks. Rocks simply do not tell us how old they are. A geologist must seek further evidence to determine the age of rocks. When geologist look at all the evidence they may begin to assign absolute dates to a sequence of rocks for which they only knew relative dates by looking at the sequence of deposition. Establishment of an absolute age of rocks is subjective and dependant upon the geologist interpretation of certain physical evidence. From the geologic record we can tell that a certain event occurred before or after another event. The various divisions of the earth’s rock record may be viewed as stages in earth’s geologic history. The work of people like William Smith shows that the correlation of rocks over even large distance may have practical application. Presented below is a representation of the stratigraphic record with information about the origins of subdivion names added. The information on subdivision names was obtained from Prothero pages 5 – 23 and Levin 1988 pages 135 – 156. The oldest stages of the development of earth's history are listed at the bottom of the chart, and the newest stages are toward the top. The charts are not drawn to scale.
Phanerozoic: The Phanerozoic (from the Greek Phaneros = evident and Zoon = life) contain the fossils of more complex organisms and is divided into somewhat unequal divisions of eras. In 1930 by G. H. Chadwick proposed two eons. The younger was the Phanerozoic Eon. The stratigraphers of the nineteenth century divided parts of the geologic column according to convenient divisions for the rocks they were studying. Had scientist in another part of the world constructed the geologic column, a far different column may have emerged. However the Phanerozoic and Precambrian would probably still have been distinguished by the appearance of complex shelled animals in the fossil record (Press 47). The Phanerozoic includes the Cenozpic, Messozoic,, and Cryptozoic Eras. |
|
|
Cenozoic: In 1840, John Phillips became the first to use the term Kainozoic Era. The next year Phillips changed the spelling from Kainozoic (from the Greek word kainos for recent to the Latinized Cainozoic. The Cainozoic included Lyell’s Eocene, Miocene, and Pliocene “Tertiaries.” The English version of Cainozoic became Cenozoic (i.e. recent life). Some European geologist prefer to divide the Cenozoic into the Paleogene (Paleocene through Oligocene) and the Neogene (Miocene through Holocene).The Cenozoic begins with the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction events and continues to the present time. |
|
|
Quaternary: In 1829, Paul Desnoyers described all of the post Tertiary deposits as of the Seine Basin as Quaternary, in reference to Arduino’s (see the Tertiary below) threefold terminology. Where later geologist characterized the faunal content of the Quaternary, they realized that it contained not only recent deposits but also deposits of the ice ages. Holocene: The term "Holocene" is applied to any post Pleistocene rocks which may also be regarded as "Recent. The Holocene began at the time of the melting of the most recent sheets and the concomitant rise in sea level. It is named after the Greek words "holos"(entire) and "ceno" (new). Pleistocene: In the third volume of Principles of Geology (1833), Lyell formerly proposed division of the Tertiary based on the percentage of living species found in each level. One of the divisions was the Newer Pliocene with 51% - 90% of its fossils being of of living species. When in 1839 Lyell restricted the meaning of the Pliocene to his former Older Pliocene, he coined the term "Pleistocene" for his former, "Newer Pliocene." In 1849 Edward Forbes equated the Pleistocene with the ice ages, and that definition was accepted by Lyell in 1873. It is named after the Greek words "pleistos" (most) and "ceno" (new). Tertiary: In 1760 Giovannia Aruino recognized three basic divisions in the rocks of Tuscany. The cores of mountains consisted of Primitive crystalline rocks. Above these lay the Secondary rocks consisting mainly of limestones. The Tertiary rocks were very fossiliferous sedimentary rocks found in low hills. Neogene: Neogene is the term preferred by some geologist to describe the Miocene and Pliocene. The terms 'Neogene System' and 'Upper Tertiary System' have also been used to describe what is currently called the 'Neogene Period'. The somewhat confusing terminology seems to be due to attempts to deal with the comparatively fine granularity of time units as time approaches the present and more information is preserved. Pliocene: In the third volume of Principles of Geology (1833), Lyell formerly proposed division of the Tertiary based on the percentage of living species found in each level. One of the divisions was the Older Pliocene with 33 - 50% of its fossils being of of living species. In 1839 Lyell restricted the meaning of the Pliocene to his former Older Pliocene. It is named after the Greek words "pleion" (more) and "ceno" (new). Miocene: In the third volume of Principles of Geology (1833), Lyell formerly proposed division of the Tertiary based on the percentage of living species found in each level. 17 % of the Miocene fossils represent living species. It is named after the Greek words "meion" (less) and "ceno" (new). Paleogene: Paleogene is the term preferred by some geologist to describe the Paleocene, Eocene, and Oligocene. The terms 'Paleogene System' and 'Lower Tertiary System' have also been used to describe what is currently called the 'Paleogene Period'. The somewhat confusing terminology seems to be due to attempts to deal with the comparatively fine granularity of time units as time approaches the present and more information is preserved. Oliogocene: In 1854, Heinrich Ernst von Beyrich used Oligocene for a sequence of rocks in northern Germany and Belgium. The nature of this division's fossils caused geologist to place it between the Eocene and Miocene of Lyell. It is named after the Greek words "oligos"(little, few) and "ceno" (new). Eocene: In the third volume of Principles of Geology (1833), Lyell formerly proposed division of the Tertiary based on the percentage of living species found in each level. 3.5 % Eocene of the fossils represent living species. Its name is from the Greek words "eos" (dawn) and "ceno" (new). Paleocene: The base of Lyell's Eocene was split off by the paleobotonist W. P. Schimper in 1874, and called the Lower Eocene the "Paleocene." The term "Paleocene" did not catch on until invertebrates and mammals of the Lower Eocene had also been studied. The U.S. Geologic Survey did not accept the term "Paleocene" until 1939. It is named after the Greek words "palaois"(old) and "ceno" (new). |
|
|
|
Missingzoic: Strictly speaking, the Missingzoic is not a part of the geologic record, since it is missing. The Missingzoic represents those sediments that would have been washed away as the Cretaceous seas regressing before the Tertiary started. |
|
|
Mesozoic: In 1840, John Phillips became the first to use the term Mesozoic (i.e. middle life). In its first use the Mesozoic included the Cretaceous, Jurassic, and the New Red Sandstone (part Triassic and part Permian). Today the Mesozoic begins with the Permo-Triassic extinction events and concludes with the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction events. The Mesozoic concluded with the massive flooding of most of the earth that produced the famous chalk beds for which the Era is named (Levin 430). By the start of the seas had regressed from most of the land into newly opening ocean basins (Levin 491). |
|
|
Cretaceous: In 1822 d'Holloy, while preparing a geologic map of France, recognized the Terrain Crétacé (Latin creta, chalk), rocks equivalent to those composing the White Cliffs of Dover. Conybeare and Phillips modified the French term to Cretaceous. Jurassic: Alexander von Humbolt described the massive limestones of the Jura Mountains in Switzerland as the "Jura Kalkstine" during a geologic excursion through France, Switzerland and northern Italy in 1795. In 1839, Leopold von Buch applied von Humoldt' term to the rocks of southern Germany. Later geologist recognized a similar sequence of rocks in England. Thus, the Jurassic System became established for rocks in England, France, and Germany. Triassic: In 1815, Friedrich August von Alberti began studying salt deposits in southern Germany and carefully documenting three divisionis and their fossils. In 1834 he formally named these three units as the Trias, or Triassic, in reference to the threefold subdivision. |
|
|
Paleozoic: In 1838, Sedgwick applied the term Paleozoic Series (i.e. ancinet life). to the less-metamorphosed rocks beneath the Old Red Sandstone. The upper bounds of the Paleozoic is now considered to coincide with the massive Permo-Triassic extinction events. For right now, the Paleozoic is considered to begin with the Cambrian. Recently, discoveries of abundant fossils in the Upper pre-Cambrian have caused some geologist to suggest that these rocks should be included in the Paleozoic. Permian: In 1841 Murchison described a series of rocks above the Carboniferous, near the town of Perm in the Ural Mountains. He described these as Permian. Carboniferous: In 1822 Conybeare and Phillips coined the term Carboniferous (Latin, carbo, coal) for the coal measures of England and three underlying units. European geologist recognized that the Carboniferous consisted of a lower sequence and the upper Coal Measures. Pennsylvanian: Coal Measures were also recognized in North America, particularly in Pennsylvania. To compliment the term, Mississippian in his 1891 report on the Carboniferous, Henry Shaler Williams proposed Pennsylvanian for the North American Coal sequence best known from Pennsylvania. Mississippian: Below the coals was a sequence of limestones that were well exposed in the Mississippi Valley near St. Louis.In his 1891 report on the Carboniferous, Henry Shaler Williams recognized the Mississippian and correlated it with the Lower Carboniferous limestones of Europe.
Devonian: In the 1830's Sedgwick and Murchison worked on strata from Devonshire, and in 1839 they named these rocks the Devonian System. Silurian: In 1834, Murchison and Sedgwick worked on describing rocks exposed in Whales. Murchison named his rocks the Silurian System (after the Roman name for a Welsh tribe, the Silures). Ordovician: By 1879, Charles Lapworth, who studied trilobites and grpolites in Scotland and Whales, proposed the Ordivician (after the Roman name of another Welsh tribe), for Sedgwick's "Upper Cambrian" and Murchison's "Lower Silurian." Cambrian: In 1834, Murchison and Sedgwick worked on describing rocks exposed in Whales. Sedgwick described the Cambrian System (after the roman name for Wales). |
Precambrian or Cryptozoic
|
Precambrian or Cryptozoic (hidden life): In 1930 by G. H. Chadwick proposed two eons. The older was the Cryptozoic Eon.The time from the origin of the earth to the laying down of the first Cambrian fossils contains a poor fossil record and was traditionally ignored by most srtigraphers. After being labeled “Precambrian basement” and generally forgotten because correlation of Precambrian rocks without fossils was impossible. Some geologist applied terms to events that occurred locally in places such as the Canadian Shield. With recent advances in Precambrian Geology, the International Union of Geologic Science has recognized large-scale divisions such as Priscoan, Archean, and Prtoerozoic Eons. Currently Precambrian events are correlated using radiometric dates and described in terms of mountain building episodes called orogenies. In 1980, the soviets began to use stromatolite fossils for correlation of Precambrian rocks. Some of the Precambrian divisions currently under consideration are presented on the left (Prothero 18, 19, and 381). |
|
|
Proterozoic: The term Proterzoic comes from the Greek proteros and mean Greek "earlier or former" life. Sinian: Sinian sediments were first examined in the Three Gorges region (western Hubei Province) of the South China block. Vendian: The term "Vendian" is then reserved by some for a diverse collection of multilobed, softbodied, sessile forms that appear as fronds, disks, and other shapes. These are termed "Vendazoa" and have been proposed as a separate phylum or kingdom. The Vendian is named from rocks in the southern Ural Mountains. Edicaran: In 1946, an Australian mining geologist named Reginald C. Sprigg was exploring a range of mountains north of the city of Adelaide, Australia, known as the Ediacara Hills. He found fossilized imprints of what were apparently soft-bodied organisms. ater work established that these fossils are in fact late Precambrian. The Ediacara Hills gave a name to the entire "Ediacara biota" of the late Precambrian. Varangian: Continas rocks interpreted as the result of a great glaciations. "Varangia" was the Byzantinian name for Norway, a location of Varingian Rocks. Sturtian: Hallett Cove is one of the best known geological sites in Australia, mainly because of evidence of an ancient glaciation discovered in 1877 by Professor Ralph Tate of the University of Adelaide. These were named the Sturtian tillite boulders. The polished and striated glacial pavements, and sediments associated with the glaciation, are known throughout the world. Riphean: The Riphean is best known from a thick layer of sedimentary rocks located in Northwest Russia. The Riphean is named for the mythical Riphean Mountains mentioned in Dante Alighieri’s Divine Comedy. The Riphean Era has three informal periods. The oldest period is the Burzian Period, followed by the Yurmatin Period and then the Karatau Period. All three are named from sedimentary rocks in a section of the southern Ural Mountains in Russia. Huronian: The Huronia is known mainly from Canada and the United States in North America. The Gowgonda Formation of Ontario is especially noteworthy for its excellent preservation of glaciogenic strata dated about 2300 million years old. Other glacial deposits are found in Wyoming, Michigan, Quebec, and the Northwest Territories. These rocks record evidence interpreted as extensive Early Proterozoic continental glaciation, during which three or more glacial expansions took place. The configuration of the continents during this time is highly speculative. The Huronian in nmed for the Lake Huron area of Canada.
Archean: The Archaean is one of the divisions of the Precambrian. Some geologists also use the term Arcaezoic to describe the era preceding the Proterzoic. These are the oldest rocks found on earth. The term Archean means "first" or "primary". Randian: The Randian is a system of the Upper Archaean rocks that includes the Ventersdorp, Witwatersrand, and Dominion Reef sequences. The system is named for the area of the Witwatersrand basin in South Africa, a location famous for its gold deposits. Swazian: The Swazian is a sub-era of the Archaean that includes the Onverwacht, Figtree, and Pongola sequences of South Africa. The Swazian is named after Swaziland in South Africa. Isuan: The Isuan is a system of the Lower Archaean that is named from the Isuan supercrustal rocks of western Greenland that include the Amitsôq gneisses.
Priscoan: The first of the three subdivisions of the Precambrian, lasting from the formation of the Earth to the Archaean. Hadean: The Hadean is strictly speaking not a geologic period, because no rocks this old have been discovered on earth. Geologists have discovered meteorites and moon rocks that are believed to be from the Hadean. This period is named for Hades. The name Hadean was coined by geologist Preston Cloud. |
|
|
|
Presented above is a brief description of the origins of the names of various divisions of the geologic column. Names such as Cambrian or Ordovician were first used to describe rocks at a particular location. Then, through the process of geologic correlation, the terms were applied to rocks containing similar fossils all over the world. All that the fact that rocs contain similar fossils indicates is that they originated in similar environments. The diagrams of the geologic table presented throughout this paper have approximate dates indicated in the far right hand column. These dates are estimates of when the rocks containing each type of fossil might have been deposited. The rapid and catastrophic nature of the earth’s geologic history would suggest that events did not necessarily occur at the same time all over the world. For example, while Cambrian rocks may have been deposited in Europe, Silurian rocks may have been deposited in North America. It appears that generally the geologic record went through the same sequence of stages at different locations around the world. A catastrophic model of the geologic record allows for some stages to be skipped in a specific area, while a general pattern of sedimentation is maintained globally. A full model of the geologic record from a catastrophic perspective is being developed by several geologist, and will greatly aid in our understanding of the earth’s history. Hopefully this paper will be of assistance in building a catastrophic model of the earth’s geologic history.
Best, M., (1982), Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology, W. H. Freeman & Company, New York Burnet, T., (1965), The Sacred Theory of the Earth, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Il Davis, W., And Solomon, E., (1986), The World of Biology, Saunders College Publishing, New York Geikie, A., (1910), “Geology”, Eleventh Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica, pages 338 – 674, Britannica Publishing Company, New York Levin, H., (1986), Contemporary Physical Geology, Saunders College Publishing, New York Levin, H., (1988), The Earth Through Time, Saunders College Publishing, New York Press, F., and Silver, R., (1978), Earth, W. H. Freeman & Company, New York Prothero, D., (1990)., Interpreting the Stratigraphic Record, W. H. Freeman & Company, New York Stearn, C., and Carroll, R., (1989), Paleontology, John Wiley & Sons, New York USGS, (1999), Paleontology at the U.S. Geological Survey, [On-line] Available: http://geology.er.usgs.gov/paleo/ Xrefer the Web's Reference engine, (2002), [On-line] Available: http://www.xrefer.com/ |
|